Post Priestly Additions and Rewritings in Exodus 35 40 An Analysis of MT LXX and Vetus Latina 1st Edition by Domenico Lo Sardo – Ebook PDF Instant Download/Delivery: 3161595874, 9783161595875
Full download Post Priestly Additions and Rewritings in Exodus 35 40 An Analysis of MT LXX and Vetus Latina 1st Edition after payment
Product details:
ISBN 10: 3161595874
ISBN 13: 9783161595875
Author: Domenico Lo Sardo
Die Textgeschichte von Ex 35-40 ist komplex. Domenico Lo Sardo argumentiert in dieser Studie für die Präzedenz der in der Vetus Latina übersetzten Textfassung und den Masoretischen Text als erweiterte Legitimationserzählung für den einen Tempel in Jerusalem
Table of contents:
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Preamble
1.2 Identification of the Textual and Literary Problem
1.3 Previous Problem in Exod 25-31 and 35–40
1.4 Working Hypothesis of the Monograph
1.5 Working Methodology: Text and Literary Critical Method
Chapter 2 History of Research from Origen to the Qumran Discoveries
2.1 Preamble
2.2 The Origins
2.3 Change of Direction
2.4 The Most Significant Stages of the Question
2.5 The Most Recent Studies
2.6 Qumran
2.7 Summary and Assessment
Chapter 3 The Construction of the Sanctuary: Text-Critical Study of Omissions and Additions in Exod 35–40
3.1 Preamble
3.2 Text-Critical Study of MT Exod 36:8b–34 (LXX Exod 37:1–2)
3.2.1 Description of the Variant
3.2.2 Quantitative and Qualitative Differences between LXX–MT Exod 26:1–29 and MT–Orh Exod 36:8aβ–34
3.2.2.1 Differences in the Vorlage
3.2.2.2 The Dependence of the Hexaplaric Text from LXX Exod 26 in Comparison with MT
3.2.2.3 Identification of Different Authors for the Two Sections (Exod 26//MT Exod 36:8aβ–34)
3.2.2.4 Variations in Spelling
3.2.3 A Further Observation
3.2.4 Toward a Conclusion
3.3 Text-Critical Study of LXX Exod 38:18–20 (Absent in MT)
3.3.1 Description of the Variant
3.3.2 Exod 38 in LXX, MT, and VL
3.3.3 Exod 38:18–20: Addition, Omission, or a Different Vorlage?
3.3.3.1 A Further Observation
3.3.3.2 A Possible Solution
3.3.3.3 Toward a Conclusion
3.4 Text-Critical Study of Exod 37:17–24 (LXX 38:13–17)
3.4.1 Description of the Variant
3.4.2 A First Observation on MT–SP–LXX Exod 25:38–39
3.4.3 Exod 37 in LXX, MT, and VL
3.4.3.1 A Further Observation
3.4.3.2 A Possible Solution
3.4.3.2.1 Intertextual Comparison
3.4.3.2.2 Extrabiblical Data
3.4.3.2.3 Link between Biblical and Extrabiblical Data
3.4.4 Toward a Conclusion
3.5 Text-Critical Study of Exod 39:33–36, 41 (LXX 39:14–15, 16–21)
3.5.1 Description of the Variant
3.5.2 A Wider Comparison
3.5.3 Exod 39 in LXX, MT, and VL
3.5.3.1 A Further Observation
3.5.3.2 A Possible Solution
3.5.4 Toward a Conclusion
3.6 Text-Critical Study of Exod 40:2, 17 (LXX 40:2, 15)
3.6.1 Description of the Variant
3.6.2 A Wider Comparison
3.6.3 The Term νουμηνια in LXX and Its Counterpart in MT
3.6.4 For Further Study
3.6.5 Toward a Conclusion
3.7 The Results of the Text-Critical Approach
Chapter 4 From the Textual Form of LXX to MT: A Literary-and Redaction-Critical Study of MT Exod 35–40
4.1 Preamble
4.2 The Origin of the andItsRedactionalHistory 4.2.1Theand Its Redactional History 4.2.1 TheandItsRedactionalHistory 4.2.1The in Literary-Critical Perspective
4.2.1.1 J. Morgenstern’s Proposal
4.2.1.2 F.M. Cross’s Proposal
4.2.1.3 M. Haran’s Proposal
4.2.1.4 V.W. Rabe’s Proposal
4.2.1.5 R.J. Clifford’s Proposal
4.2.1.6 M. Görg’s Proposal
4.2.2 A Critical Evaluation of the Proposals Addressed
4.2.3 :ItsSemanticBackgroundandUseinContext 4.2.3.1EtymologyandLexicalDifferences 4.2.3.2BiblicalUseoftheTerm: Its Semantic Background and Use in Context 4.2.3.1 Etymology and Lexical Differences 4.2.3.2 Biblical Use of the Term
4.2.3.3 Extrabiblical (Non-Jewish) Use of the Term 4.3Non−PorPre−PIdentityofthe 4.3 Non-P or Pre-P Identity of the in Exod 33:7–11*?
4.3.1 The Context and Genre of Exod 33:7–11*
4.3.2 The ofExod33:7–11∗inTradition−andRedaction−HistoricalPerspective 4.3.2.1M.Noth′sProposal 4.3.2.2A.H.I.Gunnweg′sProposal 4.3.2.3R.Albertz′sProposal 4.3.2.4M.D.Konkel′sProposal 4.3.2.5C.Dohmen′sProposal 4.3.3TowardaCriticalEvaluationoftheProposalsAddressed4.4TowardaProposal 4.4.1SomeCriticalConsiderations 4.4.1.1PreliminaryIssues:ProblemsoftheCriticaTextus 4.4.1.2FormalIssues:SyntaxandVocabulary 4.4.1.3LiteraryIssues 4.4.2APossibleUrkontext 4.4.3TowardaSummary4.5ForFurtherStudy 4.5.1Theof Exod 33:7–11* in Tradition- and Redaction-Historical Perspective 4.3.2.1 M. Noth’s Proposal 4.3.2.2 A.H.I. Gunnweg’s Proposal 4.3.2.3 R. Albertz’s Proposal 4.3.2.4 M.D. Konkel’s Proposal 4.3.2.5 C. Dohmen’s Proposal 4.3.3 Toward a Critical Evaluation of the Proposals Addressed 4.4 Toward a Proposal 4.4.1 Some Critical Considerations 4.4.1.1 Preliminary Issues: Problems of the Critica Textus 4.4.1.2 Formal Issues: Syntax and Vocabulary 4.4.1.3 Literary Issues 4.4.2 A Possible Urkontext 4.4.3 Toward a Summary 4.5 For Further Study 4.5.1 The of Numbers 11:16, 24, 26*
4.5.1.1 Content
4.5.1.2 Formal Aspect
4.5.1.3 Exegetical Framework
4.5.2 The ofDeut31:14–15,23∗ 4.5.2.1Content 4.5.2.2FormalAspect 4.5.2.3ExegeticalFramework 4.5.3TowardaConclusion4.6TheLiteraryExpansionofMTExod36:8b–34betweenof Deut 31:14–15, 23* 4.5.2.1 Content 4.5.2.2 Formal Aspect 4.5.2.3 Exegetical Framework 4.5.3 Toward a Conclusion 4.6 The Literary Expansion of MT Exod 36:8b–34 between and 4.6.1From 4.6.1 From 4.6.1From to asfromPtopost−P 4.6.2Fromas from P to post-P 4.6.2 From to $$$ as from P to Post-P
4.6.3 Taking Stock, Consequences, and Relaunch
Chapter 5 Tent and Tabernacle: From a Postexilic Theology of Transcendence to a Post-Priestly Theology of Immanence
5.1 Preamble
5.2 P and Post-P: Distinct Identities and Goals
5.2.1 Formal Analysis of Exod 26
5.2.1.1 Exod 26:1, 7
5.2.1.2 Exod 26:2, 8
5.2.1.3 Exod 26:3, 9
5.2.1.4 Exod 26:4–5, 10
5.2.1.5 Exod 26:6, 11
5.2.2 Critical Review of the Formal Elements
5.2.3 Toward a Proposal
5.3 Historical Framework and Date
5.3.1 Ancient Reasons for Rebuilding the Present and Legitimizing the Future
5.3.2 Postexilic Reconstruction in a Universalistic Key
5.3.3 Particularist Integralism of Second Zadokism
5.4 Toward a Hermeneutic: Divine Transcendence ()andImmanence() and Immanence ()andImmanence()
5.4.1 Symbolic Aspect: The Elements
5.4.2 Functional Aspect: The Context
5.4.3 Literary Aspect: Theology (or Theologies)
5.5 Toward a Conclusion: Tent, Tabernacle, or Temple?
Chapter 6 Conclusion
People also search:
e edition post and courier
j post and print
j priest building and remodeling
k and p press
Tags: Domenico Lo Sardo, Priestly, Additions, Rewritings